To mitigate the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic, governments worldwide injected significant liquidity into markets to ensure their stability, support businesses, and provide households with income. While this intervention was necessary at the time, it has left a lasting impact on the public purse. Government debt levels have reached all-time highs, and with elevated borrowing costs due to high interest rates, the expense of servicing these deficits has increased substantially.
When considering the key risks to systemic stability, many investors point to the US fiscal deficit. Whilst other developed nations (such France, Italy, and the U.K.) are running elevated fiscal deficits, there seems to be little appetite in the U.S. to tighten the fiscal stance. U.S. debt levels are at record highs and are projected to continue rising. Regardless of whether a Democrat or Republican wins the U.S. Presidential election in November, one outcome is almost certain: increased spending and running a large deficit.
Why we should not be worried about the US fiscal deficit?
The U.S. fiscal deficit is something that investors clearly need to be aware of as it has macroeconomic and geopolitical implications. Furthermore, if U.S. growth slows and/or interest rates remain high, the risks surrounding larger deficits rise. While market participants may demand to be compensated for such fiscal irresponsibility, via higher interest rates, we do not envisage a Liz Truss type scenario (partly because this was an idiosyncratic event). So why should we not be worried about the U.S. fiscal deficit, at least in the short-medium term?
We are often also asked what the likelihood is of the U.S. government defaulting. On this point, it is important to note that for a country who has their own central bank, defaulting is essentially a choice, as the central bank can print money to cover debt obligations. A recent example is Greece whose deficit burden was largely owed to foreign creditors. In this case, as their central bank was ‘outsourced’ to the ECB, they were not able to immediately print money to cover their debt obligations once foreign creditors decided to stop buying Greek debt.
So, the extent that U.S. debt is held by foreign creditors (circa 25% owned by foreign entities) is less of a tail risk than for other nations. Nearly 80% of U.S. debt is held by the public and of that two-thirds is held by domestic investors, with the Federal Reserve owning about a third of this domestically held debt. Although the portion of U.S. debt held by foreign lenders has increased over the past few decades, the majority of the government debt burden remains a domestic issue. This domestic ownership translates to fewer interest payments abroad and greater control over the nation's markets.
The Bottom Line
In conclusion, significant changes to fiscal policy are unlikely before the November election. We have previously noted how politics and markets are interrelated, so as the election approaches further discussions about fiscal spending and polling results will likely influence bond and currency markets. However, addressing the challenge of stabilising the U.S. fiscal deficit remains primarily a long-term issue. Investors need not fear a U.S. debt default but should be prepared for potential market volatility due to the fiscal and political uncertainties. The strength of the majority in November’s election will determine how much the fiscal deficit may rise, i.e. how much flexibility the new US President will have to increase spending.
Given these risks, diversifying portfolios is a prudent strategy. In the LGT WM MPS, we maintain exposure to "real assets" such as infrastructure, gold, and commodities through thematic funds and absolute return strategies. We also own a combination of sovereign bonds, gilts, and U.S. treasuries. However, arguably the best protection against a US fiscal tail risk scenario is investing in quality businesses. We consistently emphasise that quality businesses are robust, resilient, and capable of protecting investors through economic cycles and unforeseen geopolitical events. While we do not anticipate such a systemic crisis, our focus is on building resilient portfolios that can withstand unforeseen challenges. In this context, quality businesses represent the next safe haven asset.
Important information
This article was originally published by LGT Wealth and has been republished here with permission.
This communication is provided for information purposes only and is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient to whom it has been directly delivered by LGT Wealth Management UK LLP and is not to be reproduced, copied or made available to others. The information presented herein provides a general update on market conditions and is not intended and should not be construed as an offer, invitation, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any specific investment or participate in any investment (or other) strategy. Past performance is not an indication of future performance and the value of investments, and the income derived from them may fluctuate and you may not receive back the amount you originally invest. Although this document has been prepared on the basis of information, we believe to be reliable, LGT Wealth Management UK LLP gives no representation or warranty in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the information presented herein. The information presented herein does not provide sufficient information on which to make an informed investment decision. No liability is accepted whatsoever by LGT Wealth Management UK LLP, employees and associated companies for any direct or consequential loss arising from this document. LGT Wealth Management UK LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
Our team of global experts share their perspective on markets and news from the company.